<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Concepts in the Paradox &#187; east bay</title>
	<atom:link href="http://markballew.com/blog/category/east-bay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://markballew.com/blog</link>
	<description>The writing of Mark Ballew</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:53:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Spare the SUV is tomorrow</title>
		<link>http://markballew.com/blog/2006/07/16/spare-the-suv-is-tomorrow/</link>
		<comments>http://markballew.com/blog/2006/07/16/spare-the-suv-is-tomorrow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 05:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MarkBallew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[east bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market street railway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[muni]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price of gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sfgov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[street cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transbay terminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markballew.com/blog/2006/07/16/spare-the-suv-is-tomorrow/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Transportation Commission pulled $5.3m out of car registration fees for 3 more spare the air days. So guess what? Transit is free tomorrow. [Linky linky]. 
I was wondering why my DMV fees were so high &#8212; so enjoy a ride on one of the 25 transit agencies on my dime. No really, go ahead, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><IMG SRC="http://markballew.com/blog/usericons/bartmuni.png" align="left" hspace="5">The Transportation Commission pulled $5.3m out of car registration fees for 3 more spare the air days. So guess what? Transit is free tomorrow. [<A HREF="http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/07/16/MNG7JK0BA311.DTL">Linky linky</A>]. </p>
<p>I was wondering why my DMV fees were so high &#8212; so enjoy a ride on one of the 25 transit agencies on my dime. No really, go ahead, and don&#8217;t forget to exit using the rear doors (STEP DOWN!!!).</p>
<p>(ridership goes up 10%, or 155,000 people, on STA days)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://js-kit.com/rss/markballew.com/blog/p=64</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>eBART At the speed of government</title>
		<link>http://markballew.com/blog/2006/07/09/ebart-at-the-speed-of-government/</link>
		<comments>http://markballew.com/blog/2006/07/09/ebart-at-the-speed-of-government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 02:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MarkBallew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[east bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markballew.com/blog/2006/07/09/ebart-at-the-speed-of-government/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I&#8217;ve been doing research on the state of the various transit systems in the bay area lately. This time around I took a look at eBart, the Bart expansion from Pittsburg to Byron.
First of all, I think any expansion of Bart is a good idea &#8212; I&#8217;ve felt for some time now that Bart is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><IMG SRC="http://markballew.com/blog/usericons/BARTaleft.gif"><IMG SRC="http://markballew.com/blog/usericons/BARTaright.gif"></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been doing research on the state of the various transit systems in the bay area lately. This time around I took a look at <A HREF="http://www.ebartproject.org">eBart</A>, the Bart expansion from Pittsburg to Byron.</p>
<p>First of all, I think any expansion of Bart is a good idea &#8212; I&#8217;ve felt for some time now that Bart is a good system: always on time, reduces suburban traffic, and joins together Bay Area economic centers. It has it&#8217;s problems, like not always being the cleanest thing in the world, and it is sort of expensive. In the end I still feel Bart is an extremely good deal for a single traveler, though for a family it can be pricer than a cab, depending on how far they are traveling.</p>
<p>All of that said, I must wonder out loud why it takes 5 years to build <A HREF="http://www.ebartproject.org/docManager/1000000154/Corridor%20Base%20Map.pdf">a 23 mile route</A>? Actually, according to their <A HREF="http://www.ebartproject.org/docManager/1000000093/accelerated-sched_boards21.jpg">timeline</A>,  construction is a whopping 2.5 years! What are they doing for the other 2 and a half? &#8220;Scoping&#8221; and &#8220;Right of Way&#8221;. Does it really take 5 years to do all this? I&#8217;m not a project manager by any extent of the imagination, but maybe 24 months would be enough time for only 23 miles! It certainly doesn&#8217;t take that long for a freeway.</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t even ask why they didn&#8217;t start on this project until 2005; over 30 years since Bart was put into revenue service. Is the price of gas starting to hurt or something? Too many cars on your 6 lane freeways?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://js-kit.com/rss/markballew.com/blog/p=60</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

